When Jonathan Glazer made Birth in 2004, it was met with about as much enthusiasm as a trip to the dentist. However, in the years since the film has regained some critical favor, sparking many talks of a genius work that was misunderstood at the time. So it’s only fitting that Glazer follows up that movie with Under the Skin, a movie that could have been equally trashed and misunderstood. However, lucky for us viewers today, Under the Skin proves to be a mesmerizing film that takes you on a hypnotic journey and Under the Skin is one of cinema’s most unique experiences.
Under the Skin stars Scarlett Johansson plays an alien who is brought to earth, given a van, and some semblance of a plan to harvest men. We see her attempting to pick up men, failing some of the time and succeeding in luring men back to her place. But like most experiences, the alien begins to change, the interactions become longer, each situation lending a next wrinkle to her life and changing her.
If I had to address one thing about the film that I found fault with it was that the way the movie is constructed it feels both too long and too short. Much of the film is set up to mesmerize without explaining much in the way of the story, yet when the movie kicks into full gear, it’s with less than desired time left in the 108 minute running time. I don’t know whether this is a reflection of the narrative being unevenly paced or just the spell of the film hitting late, but I thought the interesting events took place in the later half. Especially with the interaction Johansson’s character has with the deformed person she meets and the ramifications it has both for her and whatever entity she’s serving, make for some really enthralling situations I wish the movie spent more time with. I would have gladly sacrificed the first sinking into the water sequence (wonderful though it was) or one of the earlier pick ups for 5 more minutes near the end of the film. Of course this is a minor squabble and Under the Skin having this problem is not the worst thing that could happen to a movie.
Despite this issue, the movie is solid enough to keep you entranced even as its spinning a wild web. Glazer is an incredible visual artist and he dazzles here. Under the Skin is a weird movie, but in Glazer’s sure hand nothing feels out-of-place or showy just to be showy, something very impressive for a movie about atmosphere. It’s probably why the more dazzling shots (the end of the first seduction, the haunting final sequence) work so well. It’s also probably why Scarlett Johansson, in a very reserved role, turns in one of her best performances yet. Though the part is physical, and yes you do see her nude, the part is so much more about being a character in a new environment whose motivations are murky, something she excels at.
I’d recommend this movie for anyone looking for a challenging film that will mesmerize.
Grade: ***1/2/****
About Post Author
Terence Johnson
You may also like
Average Rating
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
Categories
- 2013 in Review
- 2014 in Review
- 2015 in Review
- Awards Season
- Blog
- Books
- Classic Cinema Sundays
- Demon Wolfcast
- Fan Fiction Friday
- Featured
- Festivals/Cons
- Film School Files
- Friday Fantasy Adaptation
- Interview
- Movies
- music
- Op-Ed
- Oscars
- Pieces of the Week
- Podcast
- Red Carpet
- Special Announcement
- sports
- Teen Wolf
- Top 10
- TV
- Uncategorized
- Wayback Wednesday
- WonderCon
- Year in Review